|
·
Summary
·
Interpersonal
Perception was published in 1966, and
co-authored by Herbert Phillipson, chief
psychologist at the Tavistock Clinic and, and
Robert Lee, an American on a research fellowship
from the National Institute of Mental Health. The
authors met biweekly for two years in the early
sixties to discuss the ideas that would become
Interpersonal Perception. The original
idea to develop and apply the algebraic notation
for the mapping of interpersonal perspectives first
suggested by Martin Buber in The Knowledge of
Man to the field of marital counseling. Laing
had already made some preliminary contributions to
this endeavor in Self and Others. Lee
contributed the idea of creating a test to measure
degrees of experiential convergence or disjunction
between two people using this algebraic system, to
identity areas of conflict and misunderstanding.
Phillipson was primarily in charge of
administrating and scoring the test. Laing wrote
the first draft, Lee the second, and then Laing
combined the two.
Though
brilliant, this is also one of Laing's most
schematic and difficult books to read. However, it
is must reading for anyone interested in following
the development Laing's evolving technique for
"mapping" inter-experiential convergences and
disjunctions from Self and Others to
The Politics of the Family.
·
Contents
·
Foreword
by Marie Jahoda
Acknowledgements
Part
One: Theory
I. Self
and Other
II. Interaction and Interesperience in Dyads
III. The Spiral of Reciprocal Perpsectives
Part
Two: Method
IV.
Historical Review
V.
Interpersonal Perception Method (IPM)
The
issues. The two perspectives and their
two directions. The four
relationshipsas seen from each
perpective. Metaperspectives and
meta-metaperspectives. Thebasic schema
of the IPM. Patterns of conjunction and
disjuntion. Different possiblespirals
in dyadic interaction.
|
VI. Disturbed and Nondisturbed Marriages
Comparison
of disturbed and nondisturbed
marriagesRetest reliability and
internal consistency of the
data.
|
VII. The Study of a Dyad
The
pattern of interaction as a whole.The
interaction within the separate
categories of issues. Spirals in which
there is complete conjunction. Spirals
in which there is complete or nearly
complete disjunction. Spiral No. 26.
Discussion. therpaists' evaluation of
the results of brief marital therapy.
Tetest results after short-term
therapy. An interpretation of clinical
data.
|
VII. Developments
Part
Three: The IPM Questions
IPM
Chart: The Joneses
Index
|